Updated: 29 January 2014
Written by: Bert Witkamp
Agriculture in Zambia no 5. Thousands of Zambians rear chickens in the back yard. In this issue
ideas to improve the life of young chicks and save on your electricity bill.
Fig 1. The Z-factor chick brooder. Note feeders and drinkers at the border, insulation material on top and freedom of movement for chicks. |
Browsing the Internet on chicken rearing I came across an
interesting publication dating back to 1942.
It is titled New Electric Lamp Brooder; written by D. C. Kennard and V.
D. Chamberlin. You can find the publication at: http://www.plamondon.com. The site is about farming and poultry rearing. Below pictures of the
original brooder*.
Figure 3. The Ohio hover
in use. Note the freedom the chicks have in choosing their location, including
on top of the hover. The litter on top at the same time is isolating
material.
The hovers were developed by the Ohio Agricultural
Experiment Station during World War II. Its purpose in part was to reduce on
electricity usage.
The brooder or hover serves to provide a comfortable
environment for baby chicks in a cost efficient manner. It basically is a
shallow box on low posts with heating bulb(s) and possibly a light bulb inside.
Chickens can move in and out of the brooder as they like and hence choose the
environment that they feel comfortable in.
Chicken rearing in Zambia is a major backyard agricultural
activity. Both broiler and layer chickens are purchased from industrial
breeders and come in as “one day olds.” The body temperature of a chicken is 41
⁰C (109 ⁰F). These baby chickens, lacking a mother hen, need artificial
warmth until they have developed feathers – some three weeks after arrival. The
provision of a suitably warm environment is not so easy and always costly.
The usual choices are electrical heating using suspended infrared
bulbs and/or charcoal using the baula (charcoal stove). Both methods are
extremely wasteful as the heat generated is freely dispersed in the chicken
house, also if the chicks are raised in a nursery. The heat of the burning
charcoal is sent upwards, while the chicks are on the floor where it is
coldest. The infrared bulbs (see picture) do send the heat they
generate downwards, but even then much of the thermal energy winds up in the
air above the chicks.
The electricity cost of a 250 Watt lamp in Zambia presently (January 2014) is ZMW 0.125/hour (0.02 €); and
hence ZMW 3 (0.4 €) daily. You need one bulb for 100 chicks. A flock of 200
chicks therefore requires 2 bulbs at a cost of ZMW 6 daily.
The need for artificial heat in the chicken run varies
seasonally considerably. In the Zambian cold season night temperature may drop to close
to zero C with day time temperature rising to over 20 ⁰C. In the hot season night
temperature may be around or over 20 ⁰C with day time temperature rising to about
35 ⁰C. Practically a run of chicks in the winter in Zambia roughly need about 400 hrs of
additional heat; and during the hottest time of the year some 300 hours – part
of it with less or lighter bulbs.
The electricity cost with conventionally suspended bulbs for
a flock of 200 chicks in the winter is in the order of 2 x 400 x 0.125 = ZMW 100 (€ 15). In the hot season the cost roughly is half of that (ZMW 50 or € 8) and the average is somewhere in the middle – ZMW 75 or € 12.
The hover, by retaining the artificially generated
heat within the box, saves electricity. In addition the hover retains heat
generated by the chicks themselves, which also saves electricity. At this point
my estimate is a saving in electricity of about 50%.
The other major advantage of the hover is the immediately
observable effect on the well being of the chicks. Chicks crowd and sometimes
trample each other under open, suspended bulbs. Also the dispersal of heat is uneven, rapidly declining away from the centre below the bulb. The hover provides plenty of
space as the heat disperses over a much larger area.
The original Ohio brooder is 40 cm high; its bottom edge is 10 cm
from the ground, the sides are internally 20 cm and externally 10 cm (this is
the area on top of the brooder with isolation material, see figure 3.) The
bulbs are placed at opposing sides using porcelain lamp holders. Each lampholder should have its own cord, plug and socket. The sides and
top are made of plywood or similar material. The hover can be made higher as
need be by placing blocks or bricks under the corner posts. In the event of
draft sacks can be tacked to one or two sides. Initially drinkers and feeders
are placed just outside the hover. The design indeed is simple, efficient, and
low cost. You can make it yourself, though a carpenter will do a better job of
making the joints for the frame.
We keep chickens and I decided to make a hover after looking
at my monthly electricity bill. I did make the thing almost entirely myself –
involuntarily as the Zamfactor carpenter did not show up. At the onset I
decided to increase the height of the hover from 40 to 47.5 cm; to reduce the
“rim” at the top from 10 cm to 5 cm (to create higher interior sides) and to
raise the bottom edge from 10 to 12.5 cm. I wanted higher sides because of the
kind of heat bulbs we use (I thought rightly that the top otherwise would get
too hot). I increased the bottom edge by 2.5 cm to allow for the grass litter
that we use. I stuck to the Ohio hover width of 120 cm (4 feet) – which
conveniently is the standard width of plywood. I made two hovers, one 6 feet long for 200-300 chicks and one 8 feet long for 300-400 chicks.
Apart from a slight increase in height the Improved
Zamfactor Chicken Brooder has:
1. Cross
planks at the bottom of the short side that a) allow for proper mounting of the
lamp holders, b) increase the structural strength of the apparatus, c) enable
the screwing in of a hook (ceiling hook type).
2. The
option of lifting a (short) side by means of a chain (in our case a dog leash)
the end of which can be slotted into the hook mentioned above. Very practical,
certainly in the case of Big Hovers, to easily check what’s happening inside,
refill drinkers you may want to put inside during the first days and change or
add litter.
3. The
application of a coat of aluminium paint to enhance refraction of light and
heat rays, and also to facilitate cleaning of the interior. Indeed inside its
all glitter!
4. Using
screws rather than nails in assembly. More work but longer lasting.
5. Optional: Hooks in the corner posts
so that the hover after use can be lifted and suspended from the ceiling. This is
practical in case of the X-large hover.
My initial suspicion that the sides of the Ohio hover are to shallow in view of heat generated by the bulbs was confirmed at the test: the top of the hover above the bulbs, despite increased height and aluminium paint coat, became uncomfortably hot. I had to lower the lamp holders to a few cm above the edge of the sides. I am also going to glue aluminium foil on one side to see of that helps in heat refraction away from the top. It also is possible to mount the lamp holders slightly slanted downwards, but that is not really necessary. In the second hover we added a cross bar in the middle of the two long sides to support the ply wood “roof” better.
My initial suspicion that the sides of the Ohio hover are to shallow in view of heat generated by the bulbs was confirmed at the test: the top of the hover above the bulbs, despite increased height and aluminium paint coat, became uncomfortably hot. I had to lower the lamp holders to a few cm above the edge of the sides. I am also going to glue aluminium foil on one side to see of that helps in heat refraction away from the top. It also is possible to mount the lamp holders slightly slanted downwards, but that is not really necessary. In the second hover we added a cross bar in the middle of the two long sides to support the ply wood “roof” better.
In conclusion: The cost of a large hover in Zambia is about ZMW 650 (USD 100,€ 85), plus cost of the bulbs. It is a worthwhile investment both in terms of electricity cost
saving and chicken comfort.
* The black and white pictures are reproduced from the web site published article of 1942 by D. C. Kennard and V. D. Chamberlin.
Additional notes after four weeks of use:
1. Benefits exceed expectations.
Mortality rate is very low: after 4 weeks only 2%. For the first time since we
keep chickens there are no runts (stunted growers) or chicks with deformed
legs.
2. Three weeks appears to be a
sufficient period of time for hover use.
3. One could use an improvised
variety using sticks and sacks when for village chicken keeping.
4. There is more you can and should do to keep your chicks happy and
healthy. Such as:
Put mosquito gauze screens in the
windows, create an isolated ceiling by for example plastic sheet (prevents
condensation on roofing sheets in the winter and excessive heating in the
summer), ensure that no rats can enter the chicken house, adequate ventilation,
clean litter, daily cleaning of drinkers and quality food.
No comments:
Post a Comment